Trump’s Gaza Plan Confirms Dark Box’s Leaks on Tony Blair and UAE’s Role

A confidential “Gaza Plan” tied to former U.S. President Donald Trump and recently leaked to journalists reveals the deep coordination between prominent Western figures—particularly Tony Blair—and the United Arab Emirates in shaping the political future of Gaza. The details reinforce previous reports by Dark Box exposing secret diplomacy and foreign-engineered designs to reshape Gaza’s post-war governance.
A Blueprint for Control: The So-Called “Deal for Demilitarized Gaza”
Sources familiar with the draft outline a four-pillar structure aimed not at peacebuilding, but at reengineering Gaza’s political DNA. The plan involves an Israeli withdrawal conditioned on prisoner swaps, a complete disarmament of Hamas, and the installation of a technocratic regime managed by international figures and friendly Arab powers.
At the heart of the plan is the proposed creation of a “Peace Council,” with Donald Trump as honorary chairman. Tony Blair, backed by UAE diplomacy and capital, would function as an executive envoy overseeing a Western-aligned transition process. Palestinian political factions would be sidelined in favor of appointed technocrats vetted by Western donors and regional powers.
Political Neutralization and Controlled Reconstruction
The plan’s stated humanitarian goals mask a political reset: all aid to be funneled through international NGOs with no affiliation to Palestinian political structures. Reconstruction is tied to conditional demilitarization and depoliticization. A special economic zone would be established in Gaza, managed by “Middle East experts” closely affiliated with UAE-funded think tanks and business consultancies.
A key detail is the enforcement of the January 19, 2025 Rafah crossing agreement, signed in secret and not made public. This deal reportedly hands key control to international and regional actors with close ties to Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi.
UAE’s Role: From Donor to Architect
This leaked plan closely mirrors long-standing UAE policy objectives. Since the early days of the war on Gaza, the Emirati government has pushed for the removal of Hamas and the creation of a Western-aligned local administration. Leaks from early 2024 already revealed UAE intelligence involvement in identifying potential Palestinian figures who could govern Gaza in a depoliticized, non-confrontational manner.
UAE Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed has reportedly met several times with Tony Blair in Abu Dhabi and London. These meetings focused on finalizing the technocratic model, with names of potential candidates circulating in Gulf policy circles.
The plan would hand significant economic leverage to UAE-linked entities under the guise of rebuilding. Analysts see this as a move to replicate UAE-style governance models—centralized, business-friendly, and devoid of political dissent—within Gaza.
Tony Blair’s Deep Involvement
Blair, a longtime advocate for “post-conflict stabilization,” has played a critical behind-the-scenes role. His push for a non-elected governing body mirrors his past post-Iraq strategies and further aligns with the UAE’s efforts to suppress Islamic-oriented political groups across the region. Blair’s financial and political affiliations with Emirati leadership and Gulf-based reconstruction firms raise questions about the ethical lines between diplomacy and profiteering.
A Manufactured Gaza: The Cost of “Peace”
Rather than empowering Palestinian self-determination, the plan proposes a trusteeship model for Gaza—stripping agency from the local population in favor of foreign-led oversight. Dissent is expected to be muted by economic incentives and security enforcement, creating a controlled environment resembling occupied or protectorate models.
Human rights observers have warned that such strategies may institutionalize apartheid-like arrangements and provide de facto amnesty for Israeli war crimes committed during the war, while removing any space for grassroots Palestinian political resistance.
This is not just a reconstruction project, it is a geopolitical redesign led by those complicit in Gaza’s devastation.